It is currently Fri Apr 20, 2018 10:25 am

Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 Intro to PTS Orifice Plates 
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:35 pm
Posts: 1687
Location: Pennsylvania
Eeyore wrote:
Yeah, I've read the 101 and a lot of other threads on here. I just wanted to make sure I understood the 0-16" and in your example 0-300 cfm. It seams that the value is always given as an absolute, as in 300 cfm and 16". I wanted to make sure I was correct that in use it is a variable and that is what the DM or water manometer is measuring. I got it, that's what I thought, I just didn't read it that way. I need to make another longer post, but this is probably the wrong area. Thanks Bruce!

Oh one more thought. I think I read somewhere on here that you were thinking of offering a DM that worked at a lower differential (less than 16"), is that still a possibility? Just seems it would lower the vacuum motor demands.

Thanks again!

The DP thing can be somewhat confusing it's kinda "oh now I understand" when it does sink in, I can understand the frustration.

Your post actually made me think about doing a simple Flowbench 101 video for the new user going over some of these items to give those who are new to what a flowbench is and how it basically works.

I actually have built a DM using a 8.5" sensor way back when but found it would offer to much bounce in the numbers same as you get with to little rise in a water gauge. I know there are a few differing opinions on DP and power required for a flowbench of which I'm not going to get into a big debate over. I've found that 16" works well for my PTS design 0-600cfm small bench.


Who . . . me? I stayed at a Holiday in Express . . .

Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:00 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 1298
Location: Melbourne, Australia
You won't really gain that much in extra flow by lowering the motor operating depression from 44 inches (16 + 28) to 36 inches (8 + 28).
But it can potentially increase the difficulty of achieving good stable flow, and wide pressure measurement range through the measurement orifice.
Its not a good trade off.

Also known as the infamous "Warpspeed" on some other Forums.

Tue Feb 14, 2017 5:51 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF